Greetings, I'll respond to the review as the second owner of the pr...

🌊 CS2RUSH 🌊 - PUBLIC | !KNIFE !SKINS !CWGood evening 🌆, I decided to share my opinion about the project a little (maybe not so little). After the change of owner, life blossomed again on the server, old unjustified bans were lifted, the new owner is more sensible than the first, but there are still nuances. Most project websites, as you might have noticed, are the same (the cover may be different), so, this is a "single" template, it can be bought for just 2,000 rubles, modules are purchased additionally for this template. The previous owner - вазикс, bought several modules including the engine, but decided to leak all of it into public access (then had to apologize🧎🏻‍♂️), and ended up on the blacklist, in fact losing all resources. So, when selling, if agreed in advance, roles can be transferred, but вазикс didn't have those roles, вазикс once again leaked the site resources, giving access to the new owner. The new owner - невер, sat with us in a voice chat on Discord and said that he would purchase all the necessary modules later. Time passed, but the desire to buy became less and less, in the end невер refused to purchase the goods he was using, of course they told him it was a bad idea, but he decided not to listen. As a result, the project has plugins, modules, an engine for which the authors were not paid (this is called leaked resources), the new owner will bring his project into the "black", this is a huge minus. (According to him, he doesn't need modules and so on, but for some reason they are still on the site now xd) After the situation with the use of leaks, suddenly a wipe of the public happened, I'm not really surprised actually, whoever brings his project into the "black" will have "blackness" happen. The most interesting thing is that I'm still blamed for this (I was neither a developer nor anyone else, I actually had no access), someone of course said that he showed the data on his demo, but at that moment I was busy creating databases for my project, I don't have any rollbacks or anything like that, I don't know how, in his opinion, I could have gotten them 🤷🏻‍♂️, but apparently they needed to find a scapegoat. And all the subsequent time I was treated with a biased attitude. Regarding nepotism (this was mentioned in reviews of this server earlier), it really exists here, a bunch of people in positions who don't understand anything properly (for example, they ban administrators for the fact that an admin banned cheaters), and the reason for the admin's ban is "banned too quickly". A schoolkid Chappa who holds the Media role and has moderator tools, joins voice, insults people for no reason, brings up relatives, applies sanctions to participants for no reason (I personally haven't really seen him on the project, he most likely didn't even join the server, but he's already a moderator and media). As for the server itself technically, everything was more or less fine until the use of neural network. I am against a neural network doing people's work for them (At that moment they had a developer who could easily have done it many times better). I approve of AI as an assistant, but not as a developer. Specifically for them, the neural network is the developer. Apparently, they don't chase quality, because they also plan to make AI-garbage for the site. In general, it's their business, but this is a huge loss of quality. Oh, and by the way, I was banned for attaching reactions to the owner's photo, where he apparently spoils the skinchanger update. It was already clear from the screenshot that the work was of poor quality, for which I gave the following reactions "🅰️ℹ️🧑🏻‍🦼", apparently he realized that I would criticize and decided to immediately kick me from Discord, so that only the guys who will applaud remain, no matter what they are actually doing there. Bravo👏🏻 Especially for the particularly gifted, I'll explain. A review - in this context, it's a player's opinion about the project, the review is aimed at making them listen to criticism and fix mistakes (if any), I have no goal to dissuade people from playing on this project or to somehow hinder its development, on the contrary, I am "helping". As the founder of this project, I am very sorry that everything is so sad with the project now, the project had a gorgeous start, big ambitions, but it is only being broken further( On monitoring, it's rare to see negative reviews about a server, but here there are already 3 whole ones! This is a reason to think.

Sagamika Updated a day ago

Original language: Russian

Greetings, I'll respond to the review as the second owner of the project and, also, a developer. First of all, thank you for your honest opinion and for pointing out the problem areas. Secondly, I'll address most of the statements from this review.

Regarding the purchase of modules and the template. In the stressful situation after the change of ownership, n number of wrong decisions were made. We were handed an empty project that we hadn't even had time to look over when people from various development teams flew into our server and started making demands, while simultaneously taking down the site and our other resources. Officially, I personally plan to buy the template, because I want to have official ownership + updates in the future. I haven't had my friend request accepted by Sidney yet, but I'll try to find somewhere else to buy the template if I don't get a response directly. As for the modules, to be honest, I don't even know which ones are purchased. As soon as I finish fixing the main bugs on the server side, I'll move on to the site. All purchased modules will be rebuilt and will have nothing in common with the previous ones (which we didn't buy).
Regarding the leak, you are not accused. It was done by another person.
Some people in positions were taken from other servers and had prior experience with this. Some were placed based on trust, but in smaller roles. There's no favoritism when it comes to covering up violations; all violations are strictly stopped, although this happens in the admin zone. In terms of the current staff, I can somewhat agree with you — I'm not satisfied with it either. All changes will be discussed in the coming days, when the leader returns home.
As for the neural network, everyone has a different attitude toward it. Its entire result depends on whose hands it's in. I, having completed a 2-month pre-admission course on LLM models and prompt engineering, take a responsible approach to writing code and checking its quality. Nothing is written from scratch. The model is initially fed context with open-source modules written by hand, and only after training does the model begin its work. Personally, I see nothing wrong with using AI in the early stages of the project, when all the server's revenue doesn't allow covering the costs. In the future, as earnings increase, the modules\plugins will be rewritten by experienced developers. I appreciate the work of people who strive for development in writing plugins, but sometimes it's financially more profitable for the project to make some concessions in terms of investment-profit. At the moment I only deal with the server's technical side, I'm not responsible for the site. If something there is shitcoded by an AI, I'll sit down and redo it.
Regarding your ban, I haven't been brought up to speed on it, but if I were the other developer, I would have wanted to hear concrete criticism of the shitcoding rather than just the statement AI = cripple.

I hope I managed to at least slightly change your opinion toward the server with this response. Thanks for reading, have a nice game.🥇