Thanks for the feedback. Later on we realized that we shouldn't have started responding to provocations from another project and getting dragged into that situation at all. Sometimes it really is better to just not react.
We’ll be glad to see you on our project — come by, we’ll be waiting!
As we already wrote earlier, we see no point in getting into further arguments or continuing to discuss the same events. We have stated our position, and you have stated yours. Every player can review both sides for themselves and decide where they are more comfortable playing. We wish you luck on the project you choose.
Thank you for the detailed review. We will not argue with your personal impressions of playing on the server, but we are compelled to clarify several important points, since the review contains information that does not correspond to reality, and some significant circumstances were omitted.
Let us start with the main thing: the Interworld administration was not and is not “in collusion” with Charm1574. The administration did not give him creative mode for griefing the server and did not help him destroy other players’ builds. Moreover, Charm1574 has been banned on our project for quite some time already.
The claims that the administration, allegedly together with Charm1574 and other players, deliberately harmed your clan are your version of what happened, not an established fact.
At the same time, the review fails to mention an important part of the story directly related to your ban. On the server, you advertised another gaming project and also spread accusations against the administration among players, claiming that it was “in league with Charm” and deliberately acting against you and your clan.
It was precisely these circumstances, and not the mere fact that you “came to talk to a friend,” that caused the administration’s reaction.
Therefore, the wording that the administration was allegedly invisible, “eavesdropped on a private conversation,” and then banned you gives readers an incomplete picture of what happened. Invisibility mode is a standard moderation tool used to monitor compliance with the rules directly inside the game server.
No one forbids you from having a negative opinion of Interworld, criticizing the project, or preferring another server. But advertising a third-party project on our server and spreading unsubstantiated accusations against the administration among players is no longer just a personal opinion about the quality of the server.
We will comment separately on the statement that nearly the entire server is a “carbon copy of the course.” This also does not correspond to reality. Interworld’s modifications, mechanics, and game systems are self-written and are developed specifically for our project by our team. The project is constantly evolving, and the existence of similar mechanics on other servers does not mean they were copied.
We take comparisons of Interworld with other projects calmly and understand that different players like different mechanics, PvP, balance, and play style. You have the right to recommend other servers and share your experience — but we would like readers to receive the full picture of what happened alongside the accusations against the project.
Especially when a review separately recommends another server yet does not mention that the same project had previously been advertised by you directly inside Interworld and that this was one of the reasons for the administration’s claims.
We do not intend to enter into further public conflict and wish you an enjoyable game on the project that truly suits you.
Good afternoon!
You did not specify that you did not write to the administration for help in solving the problem; you entered the server and started cussing everyone out with hard profanity, there is no other way to put it, for which you were given a warning and threatened with a ban. You replied that you don't give a shit… and continued the insults, for which you were banned
Our players always know that they can rely on the administration for any help and we will not refuse them, because players are our highest priority
In your case, there were no appeals, only insults
Sincerely, InterWorld Administration
Good morning.
I don't deny that I was emotional and could have spoken harshly. However, the reason for my dissatisfaction did not come out of nowhere. In my review, I was talking not only about the ban itself, but about the attitude towards players that I had observed on the server before and which, as it seemed to me, had not gone away.
You focus solely on my reaction at a specific moment, but completely ignore the reasons that led to it. If a player who has been part of the community for a long time returns and instead of normal dialogue ends up in such a state, perhaps it’s worth considering not only his words, but also why the situation arose in the first place.
Yes, contacting the administration would have been a more correct decision. But the assertion that players always have support and help contradicts my personal experience, which is what caused the review.
I’m not trying to portray myself as perfect or absolve myself of responsibility for my words. But reducing the whole situation to the formula "came, insulted, got banned" is too much of a simplification. My review was not about the punishment, but about the reasons why I became completely disillusioned with the project.
Good day! It is important to us that all players are satisfied, please write to us in technical support, we will try to figure out the situation. Telegram - https://t.me/interworld_support_bot
Good day! It is important to us that all players are satisfied, please write to us in technical support, we will try to figure out the situation. Telegram - https://t.me/interworld_support_bot
Write to us on the Discord or Telegram support channel, we'll sort out the situation. DS - https://discord.com/invite/7CVSZpfYNp TG - https://t.me/interworld_support_bot