As we already wrote earlier, we see no point in getting into furthe...

loonetttFirst, I never claimed that the administration officially gave Charm1574 creative mode for griefing. I described what happened from my own point of view and the conclusions we reached based on the events taking place at that time. If the administration has evidence to the contrary, they can provide it. Second, you claim that the reason for my ban was advertising another project and spreading accusations against the administration. Fine. Then a simple question arises: if my ban was indeed issued for that, how did the administration learn the contents of my conversation with another player? I don't deny that I may have publicly criticized the server, expressed my opinion, or told other players about what happened. I'm specifically talking about a conversation that took place between me and another player, after which the ban followed. And here another question arises. Throughout this entire situation with Charm1574, DagonUr, and the subsequent events, I expected the administration, above all, to conduct a proper investigation and try to understand what was going on. However, instead of a full inquiry, establishing the circumstances, and attempting to help resolve the conflict, the result was that I ended up banned. That is precisely one of the main reasons I developed serious questions about the administration's methods. Separately, I want to give a specific example related to the use of invis. You write that invisibility mode is a standard moderation tool. No one disputes that. However, there is another case that I consider important for understanding the situation. The screenshot attached to this reply shows my acquaintance's correspondence with InterWorld support regarding a player who gained access to invis mode by exploiting a bug. I was not a participant in that conversation myself — my acquaintance shared the screenshot with me. Moreover, the information and evidence about that situation were not publicly available. They were held by the player himself and two administration representatives who were involved in reviewing the case. In the screenshot, the administration confirms that a complaint about this player had already been received and that punishment had been issued for it. I am not providing this screenshot as proof that the administration used this method to monitor me. It does not prove that. I am providing it as confirmation that gaining access to invis through a bug did actually happen and was known to the administration. Therefore, the very existence of such a situation is not something I invented, and I consider it inaccurate to reduce my account solely to the administration's routine use of invisibility mode. If my ban was truly issued solely for advertising a third-party project and spreading accusations, then the main question remains: why did the content of my private conversation with another player become known to the administration? At the same time, I do not currently plan to contact Hytale support about this situation. I have no interest in getting the project shut down or creating problems for the people who continue to play on it. I believe players should decide for themselves whether they want to keep playing on InterWorld when they have information about situations like this in front of them. However, I believe the materials I have gathered are enough for competent Hytale representatives to conduct an independent review of the project if necessary and then take appropriate measures based on the results, if violations are indeed established. As I wrote above, every player has the right to decide for themselves how, where, and on which server to play. So I suggest that readers of this comment take neither my words nor the administration's response at face value. You can independently ask around among third-party players from other servers, compare their experiences, and only then draw your own conclusions about the project. I only want other players to know in advance about the situations I personally encountered and to be able to make their own decision so they don't find themselves in a similar situation. In the end, your response only reinforces my initial impression: instead of a proper examination of the whole situation I described, a significant part of the response is spent disputing my version of events. And instead of an attempt to understand the conflict, establish the circumstances, and help its participants, the outcome for me was a ban from the project. So every reader can decide for themselves whose version seems more convincing. And if anyone has doubts, I suggest looking at the available evidence on your own and asking players familiar with the situation for their opinions, including those from other servers.

mccrown 2 days ago

Original language: Russian

As we already wrote earlier, we see no point in getting into further arguments or continuing to discuss the same events. We have stated our position, and you have stated yours. Every player can review both sides for themselves and decide where they are more comfortable playing. We wish you luck on the project you choose.