EmirkaQcold
Original language: Russian

You wrote a lot, I’ll answer in parts. How the fuck is “I fuck your holey daddy 24/7” not an insult? Are you a complete retard? And why the hell did you ban Pukhlya at all—he didn’t even insult you, you just banned him for ordinary insults. For insulting an admin, that’s a joke altogether; for that, chsp is fucking great, I think. Comes out kinda hypocritical.

32
EmirkaQcold
Original language: Russian

Nobody's saying all the cash is purely for beer—this shit still has to be maintained, plugins and host. But again, you can't deny that it was the sponsors who were sending you money. And when you joined the server, you didn't fucking talk to them the same way. You talked to them normally, but with us you snarled, and plenty at that. The mute is a joke. Just perfect timing after the shitstorm started—you come in literally 3 minutes later and fuck us over for an argument that wasn't even with you, but with the guys. Then you decide to mute and ban, but when Vendetta was cursing out people's families, and we were sending you Game Monitoring docs, you didn't give a fuck? Check the chat yourself, unique one. You yourself handed out a ChSP for insults, but you don't punish sponsors. Vendetta is sponsor+, it's just that his prefix is hidden and he doesn't sit in the Discord channel; how do I know? I used to be in a squad with him. And the fact that they specifically want to take me out—that's their goal.

31
EmirkaQcold
Original language: Russian

This bro doesn't remember the beer handouts he bragged about? Or that he always wrote that sponsors+ are priority? And the moment his “white masters” started getting humiliated, he came in like an attack dog and started insulting us, stirring shit, and ended up ban-hammering, even though those dumbfucks started it all. And when Vendetta started cussing out relatives with dick insults—yyyy, I'm blind, I don't see the family insults, I don't see the family insults. And the sponsors hit us, because only they knew we had a place in that square, fuck, even nachek was on a copter and one got clipped. And what are you rambling about bots for, dumbfuck. You wiped 6 people, you think 3 can't be bothered to write what a dickhead you are? Worst server, for such hardcore bootlicking. You came running like a dog to defend.

44
emirkefir
Original language: Russian

Are you really so naive as to think that all the money goes straight to beer? Sponsors get priority in replies to messages, yes, they pay money for that. They don't have any advantages as such that aren't written in the product card. I didn't log in to defend donors at all, but to check the updates that the commits confirm. To issue a mute, I always have RCON, and I don't have to join the server at all. I talk to everyone like this; the sponsor chat confirms it, where I communicate in exactly the same way. You got banned for violating server rules (insulting the administration/server, PP 2.8), as well as ChSP (repeated violation of server rules). About "I don't see any insults toward relatives"—those expressions were not insults toward relatives + I wasn't watching the chat constantly; again, I was busy with the update and typing to you in the Discord chat. Besides, Vendetta is the same kind of player as you; he didn't even seem to have a prefix. It's stupid to claim that the sponsors banned you just because only they know the square. Anyway, I think I answered everything; I'm waiting for more arguments. How I love countering every word of yours hahahahaha.🤡🤡🤡🤡

39
EmirkaQcold
Original language: Russian

My mouse sensitivity was set low because the mouse is cheap. And I mean, was I just dragged in by association? And as soon as our whole squad got wiped, they came to blow up exactly us—specifically the server donors, the ones you get along with perfectly—while you tell us to fuck off. When we expressed outrage at such vile bans, we were sent to the banana islands, roughly speaking, and shut up.

GameMonitoring administration, sorry for the foul language, but everything I said above is the absolute truth. The server owner, in collusion with the donors, banned all of us and gave them the chance to destroy our base. And then he played dumb and unbanned us.

60
EmirkaQcold
Original language: Russian

Personally, my mouse sensitivity was set low because the mouse is cheap. But I also got caught up in it by association, apparently? And as soon as our whole squad got wiped out, the server donors—the very ones you get along with so well—came specifically to blow us up, while you tell us to fuck off. When we voiced our outrage at such vile bans, we were sent to the banana islands—roughly speaking, shutting us up. GameMonitoring administration, sorry for the foul language, but everything I’ve said above is the absolute truth. The server owner, in cahoots with the donors, banned us all and gave them the chance to destroy our house. And then he played dumb and unbanned us.

55
EmirkaQcold
Original language: Russian

The owner is licking the sponsors' balls. He doesn't give a fuck about regular players. Today, for these "gentlemen," he banned more than half the server who were unhappy with that kind of attitude.

3,089
emirkefir
Original language: Russian

The anti-cheat issued the ban — the player deliberately provoked it by maxing out sensitivity and making sharp spins. Naturally, the ban came down — that’s a normal response from anti-cheat detection in beta testing. After review, it turned out to be a provocation rather than a real cheat, so the ban was lifted.

The raid that took place while the players were banned was the actions of other players; the administration did not organize it and did not bribe anyone. The fact that those raiding turned out to be server donors is a mere coincidence, not proof of collusion.

The claim about a ban for “protest” is also not true. The punishment was issued for insulting the moderators and for repeat violations, which under the server rules is treated as a ChSP. The reason was not disagreement with the administration’s decision.

GameMonitoring moderators, please pay attention to this review — it contains direct libel.

119