emirkefir

Are you really so naive as to think that all the money goes straight to beer? Sponsors get priority in replies to messages, yes, they pay money for that. They don't have any advantages as such that aren't written in the product card. I didn't log in to defend donors at all, but to check the updates that the commits confirm. To issue a mute, I always have RCON, and I don't have to join the server at all. I talk to everyone like this; the sponsor chat confirms it, where I communicate in exactly the same way. You got banned for violating server rules (insulting the administration/server, PP 2.8), as well as ChSP (repeated violation of server rules). About "I don't see any insults toward relatives"—those expressions were not insults toward relatives + I wasn't watching the chat constantly; again, I was busy with the update and typing to you in the Discord chat. Besides, Vendetta is the same kind of player as you; he didn't even seem to have a prefix. It's stupid to claim that the sponsors banned you just because only they know the square. Anyway, I think I answered everything; I'm waiting for more arguments. How I love countering every word of yours hahahahaha.🤡🤡🤡🤡

The funniest part is that, as it later turned out, these dumbfucks weren’t even getting paid by sponsors🤣🤣🤣 Fucking schoolkids got offended over a raid in the game and are now leaving angry reviews about the server and admins🤣🤣🤣😈😈😈
What money did he take? From whom? When? Fuck, guys, when you sober up, at least send the docs for decency’s sake; I get that it’s easy to invent an accusation and write it everywhere so the truth stays somewhere out there.
You’d better go to your Somali court with your understanding of the presumption of innocence - they’ll definitely take you there. You’re writing some fucking bullshit in reviews for the best server😎😎😎😎😎
You bought a bunch of bots, created a bunch of accounts, just so more people would see your shit. No, but at least you could spam with facts instead of rotten spermotoxic pubescent little rhymes 🤢🤡

The anti-cheat issued the ban — the player deliberately provoked it by maxing out sensitivity and making sharp spins. Naturally, the ban came down — that’s a normal response from anti-cheat detection in beta testing. After review, it turned out to be a provocation rather than a real cheat, so the ban was lifted.

The raid that took place while the players were banned was the actions of other players; the administration did not organize it and did not bribe anyone. The fact that those raiding turned out to be server donors is a mere coincidence, not proof of collusion.

The claim about a ban for “protest” is also not true. The punishment was issued for insulting the moderators and for repeat violations, which under the server rules is treated as a ChSP. The reason was not disagreement with the administration’s decision.

GameMonitoring moderators, please pay attention to this review — it contains direct libel.

The ban was issued by the anti-cheat — the player deliberately provoked it by maxing out sensitivity and making sharp spins. Naturally, a ban followed — that's a normal anti-cheat detection response in beta testing. After review, it turned out to be a provocation rather than a real cheat, so the ban was lifted.

The raid that took place while the players were banned was carried out by other players; the administration did not organize it and did not bribe anyone. The fact that the raiders turned out to be server donors is a mere coincidence, not proof of collusion.

The claim that the ban was for “protest” is also untrue. The punishment was issued for insulting the moderation team and repeat violations, which under the server rules is equivalent to ChSP. The reason was not disagreement with the administration's decision.

GameMonitoring moderation, please pay attention to this review — it contains direct defamation.