The ban was issued by the anti-cheat — the player deliberately provoked it by maxing out sensitivity and making sharp spins. Naturally, a ban followed — that's a normal anti-cheat detection response in beta testing. After review, it turned out to be a provocation rather than a real cheat, so the ban was lifted.

The raid that took place while the players were banned was carried out by other players; the administration did not organize it and did not bribe anyone. The fact that the raiders turned out to be server donors is a mere coincidence, not proof of collusion.

The claim that the ban was for “protest” is also untrue. The punishment was issued for insulting the moderation team and repeat violations, which under the server rules is equivalent to ChSP. The reason was not disagreement with the administration's decision.

GameMonitoring moderation, please pay attention to this review — it contains direct defamation.